Teikėjai, kurie savo tekste tiesiogiai nurodė būtent šį straipsnio numerį. Tai citata iš jų pačių teksto — ne mūsų vertinimas ir ne priežastinis ryšys.
| Kas | Šalis | Ką parašė |
|---|---|---|
| The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) | US | of errors and complete. Another important interaction revolves around the use of special categories of data. Article 10(5) AI Act allows for the processing of special categories of data (as defined in the GDPR) by providers of high-risk AI systems when it is “ ↗ |
| Bitkom e.V. | DE | ensure training, validation and testing data sets remain representative, free of errors and complete (Art. 10 AI Act). Additional transparency challenges emerge due to the complexity of AI systems, making it difficult to provide detailed information to data su ↗ |
| Confederation of Swedish Enterprise | SE | es are stored, the processing activities are limited to comprise searches. As the searches in themselves qualify as processing of Art. 10 GDPR personal data that are not mandatory under EU or Member State Law, legal obligation per Art. 6 (1) (c) GDPR does not ↗ |
| German Insurance Association | DE | require (contrary to the unambiguous wording of recital 50 sentence 2) a further legal basis in addition to Art. 6 para. 4 GDPR. Art. 10 para. 5 of the AI Regulation provides for a legal basis for tests with real data only in a narrowly limited case. ↗ |
| Doctrine | FR | de permettre au public d’examiner les questions 2 Directive 2013/37/UE, cons. n°4 liberté d’expression et d’information prévu à l’article 10 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’Homme. De plus, le droit à la réutilisation des informations publiques a ég ↗ |
| FEBIS | DE | same kind of exemptions set forth in article 9. We suggest a rethinking of this approach, maybe by introducing some exemptions in article 10, as it has been done in article 9, especially in relation to data retrieved from the so-said bad press, also in conside ↗ |
| Asociación Española de Economía Digital (Adigital) | ES | important interaction between the AI act and the GDPR revolves around the use of special categories of data. Art. 10(5) AI Act allows for the processing of special categories of data (as defined in the GDPR) by providers of high-risk AI systems when it is “str ↗ |
| BSA | The Software Alliance | BE | ract with the obligation to ensure training, validation and testing data sets remain representative, free of errors and complete (Article 10 of the draft AI Act). ↗ |
| ANITEC-ASSINFORM | IT | ould cause legal uncertainty as jurisprudence develops for the same term. o SCD: It is unclear from the current trilogues whether Article 10 of the AI Act will be updated with more clarity so as to ensure that it is a valid legal basis to process SCD under Art ↗ |
| Insurance Europe | BE | proposal for a Regulation establishing harmonised rules for artificial intelligence (AI Regulation) does provide a legal basis in Art. 10(5). However, this is unfortunately limited to the development of high-risk AI and only applies insofar as this is absolute ↗ |
| VNO-NCW / MKB Nederland | NL | l categories of data as referred to in Article 9(1) or personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences referred to in Article 10, an enterprise or an organization employing fewer than 250 persons being able to provide the DPA with the relevant cont ↗ |
| Homo Digitalis | EL | or further specification. Two notable shortcomings of the Greek law are the following: (i) While it follows from the provision of Article 10 GDPR that the national legislator is empowered to take the necessary measures by providing adequate safeguards for the ↗ |
| ITI - Information Technology Industry Council | US | tentious” if there are no objections from CSAs (Article 9(6)), and a complaint is deemed “urgent” due to an absence of consensus (Article 10(4)). These bars are too low and would likely incentivise SAs to raise objections and increase the number of referrals t ↗ |
| Centre for Information Policy Leadership (CIPL) | BE | nderstanding that objections on the “summary of key issues” should be used by CSAs only in exceptional cases. In the alternative, Article 10(4) would only lead back to an urgent binding decision of the Board where the LSA and CSA cannot reach a consensus at th ↗ |
| noyb | AT | relevance. 4. Member States may provide specific requirements under national procedural law for procedures of special relevance. Article 10 - Relationship between multiple procedures In accordance with applicable national law, competent supervisory authoriti ↗ |
| Access Now Europe | FR | ch the regulations concern or will concern, or whose interests are particularly affected. Poland Code of Administrative Procedure Article 10. 19 (1960) Right to express opinion, except if urgency. Slovakia Administrative Code (1967) § 33. Opportunity for parti ↗ |
| Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft e.V. | DE | . 5 et seq.) a clear legal basis for the processing of personal data relat- ing to criminal offences in the insurance business (Art. 10 GDPR, see section 2.b), p. 6 et seq.) clear rules on joint controllership (Art. 26 GDPR, see sec- tion 2.c), p. 7 et seq ↗ |
| Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Harvard University and Brigham and Women’s Hospital | US | cover the elements of information listed in Article 10 of the Directive [including “the identity of the controller”]”). 11 solutions also creates challenges because the onward transferee may be an organization that is unable to sign the 2001 SCCs, as discussed ↗ |
| AFME - Association for Financial Markets in Europe | BE | special categories of personal data (Article 9 GDPR), processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences (Article 10 GDPR), and international transfers (Chapter V GDPR). In these cases, in addition to establishing a lawful basis for pro ↗ |
| BVPA Bundesverband professioneller Bildanbieter e.V. | DE | z.B. im Zusammenhang mit Fotos aus dem Gerichtssaal verarbeitet werden können, besonderen datenschutzrechtlichen Einschränkungen, Art. 10 DSGVO. Widerruflichkeit der Einwilligung, Art. 7 Abs. 3 DSGVO – z.B. Mitarbeiterfotos (BAG, Urteil) In einem Urteil des Bun ↗ |
| RELX | GB | t captured by GDPR. The lack of harmonisation is partially due to the large number of open-ended derogation clauses. For example, Article 10 in relation to the possibility of processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences differs acr ↗ |
| International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) | US | ation must be given at the moment the consent is requested. . . . This would normally cover the elements of information listed in Article 10 of the Directive [including “the identity of the controller”]”). ↗ |
| Secretariat of COMECE (Commission of the Episcopates of the European Union) | BE | r - the text should be interpreted and applied. Among them, the articles concerning the fundamental right to freedom of religion (Article 10 CFR) and respect for cultural, religious and linguistic diversity (Article 22 CFR). This GDPR provision is important in ↗ |
| David Erdos | GB | of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-data as specified in article 10 not 9. In general, this decision is a very reasonable but ad hoc way of seeking to (re)construct the law in the presenc ↗ |
| FORSETI | FR | trative et du droit d'accès à l'information, protégés par les articles 11 et 42 de la Charte des droits fondamentaux de l'UE et l'article 10 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droits de l'homme et des libertés fondamentales, il serait souhaitable de modifier c ↗ |
| Centre for Information Policy Leadership (CIPL) | GB | e extreme, this may also include failing to adopt relevant national provisions to enable certain processing. For instance, as per Article 10 GDPR, 5 processing of criminal data is possible only if authorised by EU or national law. Such processing is, however, ↗ |
| Joanna Strycharz | NL | like these are shed a critical light on the ‘citizen participation’ rhetoric of the European Union. According to Art. 10(3) of the TEU, ‘[e]very citizen shall have the right to participate in the democratic life of the Union. Decisions shall be taken as openly ↗ |
| McAfee | BE | PR in the financial sector the processing of criminal data for the purposes of knowing your customer (KYC) presents challenges. Article 10 requires data controllers processing criminal records to rely on legitimate interest. KYC obligations and the increased ↗ |
Šaltinis: viešų konsultacijų atsiliepimai ir pozicijų dokumentai. n = 28 paminėjimų; skaičiuojama pažodinė nuoroda į straipsnio numerį.