Teikėjai, kurie savo tekste tiesiogiai nurodė būtent šį straipsnio numerį. Tai citata iš jų pačių teksto — ne mūsų vertinimas ir ne priežastinis ryšys.
| Kas | Šalis | Ką parašė |
|---|---|---|
| Deloitte | BE | in line with article 4(5), under (a) or (b). However, almost half of the Member States have not taken this option. As anti-avoidance rules shall be limited to those cases where there is a possible abusive situation, we call on the Commission to consider if thi ↗ |
| Fastighetsägarna Sverige | SE | se derogations is unclear. The directive provides very little guidance. For example, there is no guidance regarding derogation in Article 4 with regard to loans used to fund a long-term public infrastructure project. This derogation is important, but the legis ↗ |
| Loyens & Loeff N.V. | NL | the controlled foreign company rules (paragraph 4), and the ATAD2 rules (paragraph 5). 54932355 4/21 2 Interest limitation rule (article 4 ATAD) 2.1 General 2.1.1 ATAD includes an interest limitation rule to discourage base erosion and profit shifting through ↗ |
| Tax Justice Network | GB | ITDA threshold percentages. The most relevant options are (1) the grandfathering of interest on loans agreed before 17 June 2016 (article 4(4)(a)); (2) the group ratio rule (article 4(5)) which allows group companies to apply a group escape clause for the dedu ↗ |
| Irish Tax Institute | IE | D). Article 10 of the Directive states that the Commission shall evaluate the implementation of ATAD, in particular the impact of Article 4 (the Interest Limitation Rule (ILR)), and report back to the Council of the European Union. We note that the Commission’ ↗ |
| Deloitte Belastingadviseurs B.V. | NL | onder wordt daardoor het uitoefenen van DAEB-activiteiten (sociale woningbouw) belemmerd. Dit roept de vraag op of toepassing van artikel 4 ATAD op woningcorporaties leidt tot strijd met artikel 36 van het Handvest van de Fundamentele Rechten van de EU en daar ↗ |
| Insurance Europe | BE | rom the calculation of the one-third threshold for the optional exemption in Article 7 paragraph 3. The interest limitation rule (Article 4) should be transformed into a thin capitalization rule that primarily targets debt owed to shareholders, rather than ove ↗ |
| Development company | CZ | ity within the EU real estate market and economy overall. In this respect, we propose the following: • Extend the exemption under Article 4, paragraph 4 of the ATAD to include not only large-scale infrastructure projects but also large-scale real estate projec ↗ |
| PwC IL | BE | via Article 4 of the ATAD, and the intra-group financing arrangements provisions in Article 16(8) of Pillar Two. While the mechanics of both rules are different, the outcome under both rules is that interest expense deductions may be restricted. The complexity ↗ |
| Housing Europe | BE | tenants long-term housing Alternatively, a modification of article 4 paragraph 4 could be envisaged (in bold below): 4. Member States may exclude from the scope of paragraph 1 exceeding borrowing costs incurred on: (a) loans which were concluded before 17 June ↗ |
| Federation of German Industries e.V. | DE | n of German Industries e.V. Anti-tax Avoidance Directive (ATAD) – evaluation www.bdi.eu page 5 of 14 1. Interest limitation rule (Article 4 ATAD) Several simplification rules have been introduced as optional (e.g., the safe harbor rule, which allows interest e ↗ |
| International Chamber of Commerce | FR | , the measures for EU Member States (MS) to implement tax legislation include five minimum requirements for anti-tax avoidance: • Article 4: Interest Limitation Rules • Article 5: Exit Taxation Rules • Article 6: General Anti-Abuse Rules (GAAR) • Articles 7 & ↗ |
| CFE Tax Advisers Europe | BE | ultimately serves the competitiveness and the resilience of the Single Market. For the purposes of interest deductions, the ATAD Article 4 paragraph 3 allows Member states to give taxpayers the right to deduct borrowing costs up to EUR 3,000,000 regardless of ↗ |
| EPRA (European Public Real Estate Association) | BE | ining the necessary flow of capital investment. Broadening interest deduction exclusion limits In addition to the exclusion under Article 4, paragraph 4 regarding infrastructure projects, EPRA sees merit in having the Directive address the pressing challenges ↗ |
| MEDEF | FR | e MS may decide that a General Anti-Avoidance Rule serving as a safety net may be sufficient. INTEREST DEDUCTION LIMITATION RULE (ARTICLE 4) The tax rule limiting the deductibility of financial charges has become an obstacle to business investment and recovery ↗ |
| Conseil National de l'Ordre des Experts-Comptables | FR | Lobjectif de la Directive ATAD et de son article 4 est de lutter contre la planification fiscale agressive et contre lévasion fiscale. Plus que du mécanisme de lutte, cest donc la qualité des conseillers fiscaux qui appliquent ledit mécanisme quil faut garanti ↗ |
| Tax Executives Institute, Inc | US | ertainty for taxpayers, which makes them more hesitant to invest in a particular jurisdiction, limiting growth. In addition, like Article 4 and the CFC rules, subsequent measures have rendered the GAAR superfluous. These measures include the anti-abuse rules i ↗ |
| European Business Initiative on Taxation (EBIT) | BE | ief double taxation when said article is not implemented. Taxpayers have no possibility or access to relief of double taxation if article 4, § 6, is not implemented. Even if Article 4, § 6, is implemented, there is no guarantee that double taxation is effectiv ↗ |
| European Banking Federation (EBF) | BE | take the opportunity to provide some specific comments regarding the current interest limitation deduction rules as laid down in article 4 of the ATAD Directive : • As the objective of this rule is to curtail tax avoidance through excessive debt financing, th ↗ |
| — | IT | hybrid rules purposes. Another topic is the relationship between the arm's length principle, the interest limitation rules (under art 4 of the ATAD) and the EU GAAR (under art 6 of the ATAD). Assuming that: i) under Chapter 10 of the OECD TP Guidelines (2022) ↗ |
| Studio Savorana & Partners- Advisor | IT | lia, è la mancata applicazione dell’opzione per la deduzione degli oneri finanziari eccedenti fino a euro 3 milioni prevista dall’art. 4.3 lettere a) e b) della direttiva. Allo stesso modo, pur comprendendo che ogni direttiva in materia fiscale è il risultato ↗ |
Šaltinis: viešų konsultacijų atsiliepimai ir pozicijų dokumentai. n = 21 paminėjimų; skaičiuojama pažodinė nuoroda į straipsnio numerį.