Teikėjai, kurie savo tekste tiesiogiai nurodė būtent šį straipsnio numerį. Tai citata iš jų pačių teksto — ne mūsų vertinimas ir ne priežastinis ryšys.
| Kas | Šalis | Ką parašė |
|---|---|---|
| Bitkom e.V. | DE | highlighted divergence in the interpretation of rules among various national DPAs. One divergence was highlighted in relation to Article 45/46 GDPR and particularly sensitive data according to Article 9 GDPR. With regard to the current opt-out procedures of t ↗ |
| PostEurop | BE | personal data to third countries or international organizations with particular regard to adequacy decisions adopted pursuant to Article 45(3) and Chapter VII on cooperation and consistency. While a report was submitted in 2020, the current reporting timefram ↗ |
| Selbstregulierung Informationswirtschaft e.V. (SRIW) | DE | l be highlighted. Third Country Transfers are often safeguarded by redundant mechanisms, such as adequacy deci- sions pursuant to Art. 45 GDPR, standard contractual clauses pursuant to Art. 46.2 (c) GDPR and binding corporate rules pursuant to Art. 47 GDPR. ↗ |
| Asociación Española de Economía Digital (Adigital) | ES | ansfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations with particular regard to decisions adopted pursuant to Article 45(3) of this Regulation and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC; and Chapter VII, on co ↗ |
| Telefonica, S.A. | ES | ansfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations with particular regard to decisions adopted pursuant to Article 45(3) of this Regulation and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC; and • Chapter VII on c ↗ |
| Oplysningsforbundet May Day | DK | rtrets artikel 52, stk. 1, andet punktum. Schrems II-dommen statuerer, at Privacy Shield-ordningen ikke er forenelighed med GDPR, art. 45, sammenholdt med EU's Charter om Fundamentale Rettigheder (Charteret) art. 7, 8 og 47 omhandlende privatliv, databeskyttel ↗ |
| United Internet | DE | ansfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations with particular regard to decisions adopted pursuant to Article 45(3) of this Regulation and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC; and • Chapter VII on c ↗ |
| Insurance Ireland | IE | ansfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations with particular regard to decisions adopted pursuant to Article 45(3) of this Regulation and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC; and • Chapter VII on c ↗ |
| Border Violence Monitoring Network | DE | nstitutions and the rule of law may not be reliable, especially for people on the move.51 Therefore, endangering provisions under Article 45 of the EUDPR. ↗ |
| Fundamental Rights European Experts Group (FREE-Group) | BE | ansfer of personal data to third countries or international organisations with particular regard to decisions adopted pursuant to Article 45(3) of this Regulation and decisions adopted on the basis of Article 25(6) of Directive 95/46/EC; (b) Chapter VII on coo ↗ |
| Swiss Finance Council | CH | . Need of legal certainty on adequacy decisions for third countries The European Commission’s adequacy decisions, on the basis of Article 45 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, as to whether a country outside the EU offers an adequate level of data protection, are es ↗ |
| Federation of Austrian Industries (Industriellenvereinigung) | AT | are therefore considered necessary. i. Art 45ff – Transfers of personal data to third countries or international organisations Re Art 45 (adequacy decision): The possibility to assess the adequacy of the level of protection as an instrument to regulate data tr ↗ |
| Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) | US | tential subsequent processing is irrelevant.28 In support of its opinion in the Schrems II case, the advocate general referred to Article 45(2) of GDPR, which states that the EC should consider the public authorities’ access to personal data in its assessment ↗ |
| Multi-Regional Clinical Trials Center of Harvard University and Brigham and Women’s Hospital | US | also questions the validity of the Privacy Shield, given “certain doubts as to the conformity of the ‘privacy shield’ decision to Article 45(1) of the GDPR”, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights.39 As discussed in th ↗ |
| CrowdStrike | US | suits their organization. Ref. Ares(2020)2300048 - 29/04/2020 III. FEEDBACK ON CROSS-BORDER DATA FLOWS Chapter V Art. 45 To meet GDPR standards of implementing safeguards “appropriate” to the risk to protect personal data, organizations must take into account ↗ |
| EFPIA | GB | processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (“General Data Protection Regulation”) at Art. 45. xvii CPMP/ICH/135/95ICH, § 4.8. xviii Directive 2001/20/EC, Art. 6(3)(g). xix Id. Art. 5(1)(c). xx Directive 95/46/EC, Art. 12. GDPR, Art. 15 ( ↗ |
| French Association of Large Companies (AFEP) | FR | comings or inaccuracies during the preparation of its future report. Some of these corrections are related to adequacy decisions (art 45) and standard contractual clauses ( "SCC" - art 46), which are major tools in companies daily- life for both the practical ↗ |
| International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) | US | also questions the validity of the Privacy Shield, given “certain doubts as to the conformity of the ‘privacy shield’ decision to Article 45(1) of the GDPR”, the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights.39 As discussed in th ↗ |
Šaltinis: viešų konsultacijų atsiliepimai ir pozicijų dokumentai. n = 18 paminėjimų; skaičiuojama pažodinė nuoroda į straipsnio numerį.