A8-0117/2019 28.2.2019 * REPORT on the proposal for a Council directive laying down the general arrangements for excise duty (recast)
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs Rapporteur: Miguel Viegas (Recast – Rule 104 of the Rules of Procedure) (Simplified procedure – Rule 50(1) of the Rules of Procedure) PE 626.672v03-00 Symbols for procedures * Consultation procedure *** Consent procedure ***I Ordinary legislative procedure (first reading) ***II Ordinary legislative procedure (second reading) ***III Ordinary legislative procedure (third reading) (The type of procedure depends on the legal basis proposed by the draft act.) Amendments to a draft act Amendments by Parliament set out in two columns
Deletions are indicated in bold italics in the left-hand column. Replacements are indicated in bold italics in both columns. New text is indicated in bold italics in the right-hand column. The first and second lines of the header of each amendment identify the relevant part of the draft act under consideration. If an amendment pertains to an existing act that the draft act is seeking to amend, the amendment heading includes a third line identifying the existing act and a fourth line identifying the provision in that act that Parliament wishes to amend.
Amendments by Parliament in the form of a consolidated text
New text is highlighted in bold italics . Deletions are indicated using either the ▌symbol or strikeout. Replacements are indicated by highlighting the new text in bold italics and by deleting or striking out the text that has been replaced. By way of exception, purely technical changes made by the drafting departments in preparing the final text are not highlighted.
ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION 9
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION on the proposal for a Council directive laying down the general arrangements for excise duty (recast)
(Special legislative procedure – consultation – recast) The European Parliament ,
1. ,
A.
whereas, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, the Commission proposal does not include any substantive amendments other than those identified as such in the proposal and whereas, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts together with those amendments, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance;
1Approves the Commission proposal as adapted to the recommendations of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission;
2Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;
3Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text approved by Parliament; 4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments. EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Council Directive 2008/118/EC, which replaced Council Directive 92/12/EEC, sets out general arrangements for goods subject to excise duty, like energy products and electricity, alcohol and alcoholic beverages, and manufactured tobacco. The Directive also placed a particular emphasis on the production, storage, and movement of excise goods between Member States.
The main objective of the Directive is to allow the free movement of goods while at the same time ensuring that the correct tax debt is ultimately collected by the Member States. The Commission’s Regulatory Fitness and Performance Program (REFIT) initiative was announced in Annex II of the Commission Work Programme for 2017 at the same time as a REFIT initiative for Directive 92/83/EEC. Therefore, a proposal to amend Directive 92/83/EEC will also be presented to the Council along with this proposal. The Commission carried out an evaluation of Directive 2008/118/EC in the framework of the Commission’s REFIT programme and submitted a report to the Council and the European Parliament on the implementation and evaluation of Council Directive 2008/118/EC on April 21st 2017.
The results of the evaluation were largely echoed by Council Conclusions, which were adopted on December 5th 2017. The Commission report and the Council conclusions, while reflecting general satisfaction with the Excise Movement and Control System (EMCS), identified certain areas of improvement. The main areas highlighted concerned the improvement of the alignment between excise and customs procedures and the partial or full automation of intra-EU movements of excise goods that have been released for consumption.
The following additional areas are addressed in the proposal:
It is important that excise arrangements for distance selling should be compatible with VAT arrangements.
To this end, later in 2018 the Commission will be studying options for new arrangements for the distance selling of excise goods. The Directive has been substantially amended several times and further amendments will be made. The Directive also contains several references to outdated legislation which should be updated at the same time. Consequently the Commission has decided to recast Directive 2008/118/EC in the interest of clarity.
Mr Roberto GUALTIERI Chair, Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs
Brussels Subject : Proposal for a Council Directive laying down the general arrangements for excise duty (recast)
Dear Chair, The Committee on Legal Affairs has examined the proposal referred to above, pursuant to Rule 104 on Recasting, as introduced into the Parliament's Rules of Procedure. Paragraph 3 of that Rule reads as follows:
“If the committee responsible for legal affairs considers that the proposal does not entail any substantive changes other than those identified as such in the proposal, it shall inform the committee responsible for the subject matter thereof.
In such a case, over and above the conditions laid down in Rules 169 and 170, amendments shall be admissible within the committee responsible for the subject-matter only if they concern those parts of the proposal which contain changes. However, amendments to parts of the proposal which remain unchanged may, by way of exception and on a case-by-case basis, be accepted by the Chair of the committee responsible for the subject matter if he or she considers that this is necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text or because the amendments are inextricably linked to other admissible amendments.
Such reasons must be stated in a written justification to the amendments.” Following the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the Parliament, the Council and the Commission, which has examined the recast proposal, and in keeping with the recommendations of the rapporteur, the Committee on Legal Affairs considers that the proposal in question does not include any substantive changes other than those identified as such and that, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier acts with those changes, the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts, without any change in their substance.
In conclusion, at its meeting of 19 February 2019, the Committee on Legal Affairs, with 22 votes in favour, 0 votes against and 0 abstentions The following Members were present: Max Andersson, Joëlle Bergeron, Jean Marie Cavada, Kostas Chrysogonos, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Mady Delvaux, Pascal Durand, Enrico Gasbarra, Sajjad Karim, Sylvia Yvonne Kaufmann, Gilles Lebreton, António Marinho e Pinto, Joëlle Mélin, Angelika Niebler, Emil Radev, Evelyn Regner, Pavel Svoboda, Axel Voss, Tiemo Wölken, Francis Zammit Dimech, Kosma Zlotowski, Tadeusz Zwiefka. , recommends that the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, as the committee responsible, can proceed to examine the above proposal in accordance with Rule 104.
Yours sincerely, Pavel Svoboda Encl.: Opinion of the Consultative Working Party. ANNEX: OPINION OF THE CONSULTATIVE WORKING PARTY OF THE LEGAL SERVICES OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION
Brussels, 23 January 2019
Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the general arrangements for excise duty COM(2018)0346 of 25.5.2018 - 2018/0176 (CNS) Having regard to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 28 November 2001 on a more structured use of the recasting technique for legal acts, and in particular to point 9 thereof, the Consultative Working Party consisting of the respective legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission met on 28 November and on 6 and 13 December 2018 for the purpose of examining the aforementioned proposal submitted by the Commission.
At those meetings The Consultative Working Party worked on the basis of the English language version of the proposal, being the master-copy language version of the text under discussion. , an examination of the proposal for a Council Directive recasting Council Directive 2008/118/EC of 16 December 2008 concerning the general arrangements for excise duty and repealing Directive 92/12/EEC resulted in the Consultative Working Party’s establishing, by common accord, as follows.
1The following should have been marked with the grey-shaded type generally used for identifying substantive changes:
words ' and of fallback documents referred to in Articles 27 and 28 in the context of ';
2In recital 47, the deletion of the words ‘ directly or indirectly ’, currently appearing after the words ‘ dispatched or transported ’ in recital 29 of Directive 2008/118/EC, should have been marked as a formal adaptation;
3In Article 20(1)(ii), the word ‘ its ‘ should be deleted.
4In Article 30(1), the reference erroneously made to ‘ Article 55 ’ should be replaced by a reference to ‘ Article 52 ’.
In consequence, examination of the proposal has enabled the Consultative Working Party to conclude, without dissent, that the proposal does not comprise any substantive amendments other than those identified as such. The Working Party also concluded, as regards the codification of the unchanged provisions of the earlier act with those substantive amendments, that the proposal contains a straightforward codification of the existing legal text, without any change in its substance.
Jurisconsult Jurisconsult Director General
General arrangements for excise duty (recast)
References COM(2018)0346 – C8-0381/2018 – 2018/0176(CNS) Date of consulting Parliament 18.7.2018 Committee responsible Date announced in plenary ECON 10.9.2018 Committees asked for opinions Date announced in plenary ITRE 10.9.2018 IMCO 10.9.2018 Not delivering opinions Date of decision ITRE 19.6.2018 IMCO 19.6.2018 Rapporteurs Date appointed Miguel Viegas 20.6.2018 Simplified procedure - date of decision 26.6.2018 Discussed in committee 25.2.2019 Date adopted 26.2.2019 Date tabled 28.2.2019